hi

User avatar
Kawasaki
Posts: 156
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 9:53 am
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Re: hi

Postby Kawasaki » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:00 pm

So far he has been very helpful in pointing out a few things I have missed so its very much appreciated.

User avatar
NiteHawk
Site Admin
Posts: 3121
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:33 am

Re: hi

Postby NiteHawk » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:07 pm

It's fine, Ry likes breakin shit and finding exploits. He did it in Kaos all the time and would let us know.. I don't mind him fuckin' around, hes good at it. 8)

Solved a couple things so far anyways. All good.

User avatar
iced
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:37 pm

Re: hi

Postby iced » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:07 pm

hellomarthawhatareyoudoinghereLUL762981balls

can i leave this right here

User avatar
NiteHawk
Site Admin
Posts: 3121
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:33 am

Re: hi

Postby NiteHawk » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:08 pm

iced wrote:hellomarthawhatareyoudoinghereLUL762981balls

can i leave this right here


Go ahead. 8)

User avatar
NiteHawk
Site Admin
Posts: 3121
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:33 am

Re: hi

Postby NiteHawk » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:10 pm

The only reason I added that was to prevent clients from being created, not so much to protect the data being sent.

But I should probably be using something more proper rather then a basic terminal to connect, SSH or whatever for that sort of stuff. Anything left in the client is unfortunately easy to find if you know what you're lookin' for.

User avatar
iced
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:37 pm

Re: hi

Postby iced » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:12 pm

what about this one

9C852A5686A05AA60661BC8B2E67C5F16F403B03

User avatar
NiteHawk
Site Admin
Posts: 3121
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:33 am

Re: hi

Postby NiteHawk » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:12 pm

iced wrote:what about this one

9C852A5686A05AA60661BC8B2E67C5F16F403B03


That's probably your unique ID

User avatar
iced
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:37 pm

Re: hi

Postby iced » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:18 pm

ssh would be a nightmare to implement. you'd be better off using sslstream in the long-run. it'd make doing anything a lot more difficult than relying on encoding base64 and encrypting to 128bit. and it's easy to implement.

User avatar
NiteHawk
Site Admin
Posts: 3121
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2016 7:33 am

Re: hi

Postby NiteHawk » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:21 pm

iced wrote:ssh would be a nightmare to implement. you'd be better off using sslstream in the long-run. it'd make doing anything a lot more difficult than relying on encoding base64 and encrypting to 128bit. and it's easy to implement.


Yeh I'll look into it. Networking hasn't been my forte. I don't think you can really ever be 100% secure but suppose can be a pain in the ass in doing so. I was actually intending on changing it though with the new client anyways (or was going to look into it). Someone else (Meglio) pointed out the same issue you're talking about though in the networking portion.

User avatar
iced
Posts: 64
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 9:37 pm

Re: hi

Postby iced » Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:31 pm

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.net.security.sslstream(v=vs.110).aspx

if you're making a new client, it's a good time to learn something new then. you are using source control right?


Return to “Archive Chat”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 200 guests