Shared Experience

[daedroth]

I think the Nitehawk way may be best. If your level 8, going around with a level 25, your not going to be in as much danger as you would be if you are going around with another level 8. So to me youd get less "experience" because you were being molly coddled by having a level 25 escort (also for the pkers, think of the opportunities!).
Also like the opportunity for gold being shared, seems fairer for the healer.

[Eyxom]

I think option 3 is good but there needs to be something in place to prevent it from being taken advantage of.


Idk what's to stop a level 5 from joining a level 25 and just sitting in the party getting power leveled on level 25 monsters?

Maybe like shared experience only works if everyone is within 4-5 levels of each other in the party? All members need to tag the monster?

Just spitting ideas because this seems very very easy to abuse

^ This. The collective percentage, effectively, makes the monster worth more experience, even in level range. I really like promoting group leveling to make the game more interactive; but I think there needs to be an exponential decay function after a 5 level range considering that 5 levels is a 20% value of total acquirable levels (25). That seems more fair.

That said, I like the split experience idea a lot. I think it will add a lot of teamwork to the game. Just have to make sure it isn't overly advantageous to the lower level players outside of the standard deviation of the implied leveling area.

[daedroth]

I am sure someone posted about gold sharing in parties... if not... would that be possible?

[Thoth]

I am sure someone posted about gold sharing in parties... if not... would that be possible?

This was discussed and was decided that parties can split their own gold. Shared exp is as far as Chris was going to go. If you are leveling with people who would rather not give you the gold for the mob they just killed then they should not have to not to mention there is no way to split gold between people fairly. It's complicated and unnecessary as there are tons of ways to make gold at the moment so no need to create the extra burden.

Also yes this was requested before try reading page two of this exact thread and discussed in game. Not attempting to be mean but, people should really begin by reading an entire thread if their idea has something to do with it because there is a good chance it may have already been discussed and has an answer especially if it has been brought up in the same thread, the discussions do not always happen on the forum. Otherwise, please try searching posts in the future before posting about something as the idea may already exist, is in play, is in the Future (forum split), or has just been decided against be it unilaterally by NH or generally by the community already. This is what that search bar in the right hand corner is exactly for. Apologies, this has just been happening....alot lately.

[daedroth]

Yeh i have noticed this as well (many posts on things previously posted on), I did do a search on "gold sharing" it never came up with anything (also on sharing, party, and gold).
I also honestly could not remember if i had read it on forums or was in game discussion (defiently was discussed in game).
Also yeh, this is where I read about gold sharing, but there was no actual yes or no answer given (i remembered that much also). So this posting was a progress update/check to see if it was getting done or not.
Also no feeling of mean'ness was felt :p

[Thoth]

Also no feeling of mean'ness was felt :p

Go yourself.

[daedroth]

(Much better effort!)
WHAT! WELL F..K YOU TO!